Paper Converting Mastery: How Printing, Coating, and Finishing Transform Packaging Performance

Word Count: ~3,100 words | Reading Time: 13 minutes

Introduction: From Raw Paper to Functional Packaging

A roll of uncoated kraft paper is just cellulose fiber. It offers minimal protection against moisture, provides no grease resistance, and has no brand presence. The transformation into functional packaging—capable of protecting food, building brands, and surviving real-world conditions—happens through converting processes.

As a paper converter with 50+ years of experience, we've refined these processes across thousands of product iterations. This guide demystifies the technical operations that turn base paper into performance packaging, explaining not just what we do, but why certain approaches work and others fail.

Section 1: Understanding the Converting Process Chain

The Sequential Operations

Paper converting typically follows this sequence:

1. Material Receiving and Quality Control

• Incoming base paper inspection
• Moisture content verification (critical for dimensional stability)
• GSM (grams per square meter) verification
• Surface quality assessment

2. Printing (if required)

• Plate mounting and registration
• Ink preparation and color matching
• Print quality control
• Drying/curing

3. Coating (if required)

• Coating preparation and viscosity control
• Application via curtain coater, blade, or rod
• Drying via heated cylinders or IR
• Coating weight verification

4. Finishing Operations

• Slitting to final widths
• Sheeting to final dimensions
• Die-cutting for custom shapes
• Folding, pleating, or creasing

5. Final Quality Control and Packaging

• Dimensional verification
• Performance testing (moisture, grease resistance)
• Migration testing (food contact)
• Packaging for shipment

Process Integration Challenges

Why Sequence Matters:

Printing → Coating:

• Ink must be fully cured before coating application
• Coating can affect print appearance (intentional or problematic)
• Some coatings enhance print durability

Coating → Die-Cutting:

• Coating weight affects cutting quality
• Too heavy: blunt dies quickly
• Too light: inconsistent edges
• Coating distribution must be uniform

Moisture Control Throughout:

• Paper dimensional changes with moisture content
• Each heating process (printing, coating) removes moisture
• Must allow equilibration between stages
• Final product typically 6-8% moisture content

Section 2: Flexographic Printing Deep Dive

Process Fundamentals

Flexographic printing uses flexible photopolymer plates in direct contact with substrate:

Key Components:

1. Anilox Roller: Engraved ceramic roller that meters precise ink quantity
2. Printing Plate: Raised image areas transfer ink to substrate
3. Impression Cylinder: Provides backing pressure for ink transfer
4. Drying System: Removes water/solvent from printed surface

Critical Variables Affecting Print Quality

1. Anilox Specification

Measured in:

• Lines per inch (LPI): Cell density (higher = finer printing)
• BCM (Billion Cubic Microns): Ink volume capacity per square inch

Selection Guidelines:

• Solid coverage (logos, blocks): 250-400 LPI, high BCM (3.5-5.0)
• Fine text and detail: 500-700 LPI, low BCM (1.5-2.5)
• Photo-quality halftones: 800-1000 LPI, very low BCM (1.0-1.5)

Common Error: Using high-LPI anilox for solid coverage results in insufficient ink transfer and washed-out appearance.

2. Printing Plate Considerations

Plate Types:

• Analog photopolymer: Traditional, requires film negatives
• Digital photopolymer: Direct laser engraving, faster turnaround
• Elastomer plates: For specialty applications

Durometer (hardness): Measured in Shore A

• Soft plates (30-40 Shore A): Better dot reproduction, shorter life
• Medium plates (40-55 Shore A): General purpose
• Hard plates (55-70 Shore A): Longer runs, less detail

Plate Mounting Precision:

• Registration tolerance: ±0.1mm for multi-color work
• Pressure variation across web width must be <5%
• Regular calibration essential

3. Substrate Influence

Ink Absorption Issues:

• Porous substrates absorb ink rapidly → dot gain (spreading)
• Non-porous substrates keep ink on surface → sharp detail but slower drying
• Must optimize ink viscosity and drying for substrate

Food-Safe Printing

Migration Concerns:

Food contact printing must prevent chemical migration:

Compliant Ink Systems:

• Water-based flexographic inks (our standard)
• Low-migration formulations
• EUPIA exclusion list compliance (no prohibited substances)
• Regular migration testing per framework regulation 1935/2004

Typical Migration Limits:

• Overall migration: <10 mg/dm²
• Specific substances: Varies (often <0.01 mg/kg food)

Testing Protocol:

• Simulate contact conditions (time, temperature, food type)
• Analyze migrated substances via GC-MS or LC-MS
• Compare to regulatory limits
• Document compliance for each product

Cost: £2,000-4,000 per product configuration

Section 3: Coating Technologies

Wax Coating Systems

Melt Coating Process:

1. Wax Melting: Heat to 70-100°C depending on wax type
2. Viscosity Control: Maintain optimal temperature (critical)
3. Application: Curtain coating or roller coating
4. Cooling: Rapid solidification via chill rollers
5. Winding: Tension control to prevent blocking

Process Variables:

Coating Weight Control:

• Target: ±2 g/m² from specification
• Measured: Inline basis weight sensor or offline sampling
• Adjustment: Curtain height, roller gap, line speed

Common Problems:

• Pinholes: Air bubbles in molten wax
• Solution: Degassing, optimal temperature control
• Blocking: Finished product sticks together
• Solution: Proper cooling, anti-block additives
• Strike-through: Wax penetrates substrate
• Solution: Lower application temperature, add barrier layer

Line Speed Capabilities:

• Small operations: 50-100 m/min
• Modern high-speed: 200-400 m/min
• Ultra-high-speed (rare): 500+ m/min

Aqueous Coating Systems

Dispersion Coating Process:

1. Coating Preparation: Mix polymer dispersion to target solids (typically 30-50%)
2. Viscosity Adjustment: Add water or thickeners
3. Application: Blade coating or rod coating
4. Drying: IR heaters or heated rollers
5. Curing: Some systems require post-drying cure

Advantages:

• Lower operating temperature vs. wax (safer, lower energy)
• Wide range of properties available
• Better recyclability (most formulations)

Challenges:

• Slower drying (limits line speed)
• More complex process control
• Substrate compatibility varies

Process Control:

• Solids content: ±0.5% variation affects coating weight significantly
• pH control: Many dispersions pH-sensitive (optimal typically 8-9)
• Temperature: Both coating and substrate temperature matter
• Blade angle and pressure: Affects coating uniformity

Section 4: Die-Cutting and Precision Finishing

Die-Cutting Methods

Rotary Die-Cutting:

Process:

• Cylindrical die with cutting rules
• Continuous operation (no stop-start)
• High speed capability (100-300 m/min)

Applications:

• High-volume production
• Repeated patterns
• Labels, boxes, custom shapes

Economics:

• Die cost: £500-2,000 depending on complexity
• Setup time: 30-60 minutes
• Suitable for runs: >5,000 pieces

Flatbed Die-Cutting:

Process:

• Flat die with cutting rules
• Reciprocating (stamp) action
• Slower than rotary (30-100 strokes/min)

Applications:

• Low-volume, high-complexity shapes
• Prototyping
• Occasional use parts

Economics:

• Die cost: £200-800 (lower than rotary)
• Setup time: 15-30 minutes
• Suitable for runs: <5,000 pieces

Laser Die-Cutting:

Process:

• No physical die required
• Digital file directly controls laser
• Extremely precise (±0.1mm)

Applications:

• Prototyping (no die investment)
• Ultra-complex shapes
• Very low volumes

Economics:

• No die cost
• Slower than conventional methods
• Cost-per-piece higher
• Break-even: Typically <500 pieces

Tolerance and Quality Control

Achieving Tight Tolerances:

• Moisture control (biggest variable)
• Precision equipment maintenance
• Proper die sharpening schedule
• Substrate selection (some papers more stable)

Cost Impact: Tight tolerance specification typically adds 10-20% to conversion cost due to:

• Increased quality control time
• Higher rejection rate
• Slower production speeds
• More frequent die maintenance

Section 5: Quality Control Systems

Incoming Material Inspection

Critical Parameters:

1. Basis Weight (GSM)

• Specification: ±5% typical tolerance
• Testing: Cut 100cm² sample, weigh on precision scale
• Frequency: Every roll or batch
• Impact: Affects coating weight, printing ink transfer, finished product performance

2. Moisture Content

• Specification: 6-8% typical range
• Testing: Moisture analyzer (infrared or Karl Fischer)
• Frequency: Daily or per batch
• Impact: Dimensional stability, curl, print registration

3. Caliper (Thickness)

• Specification: ±10% typical tolerance
• Testing: Micrometer at multiple points
• Impact: Die-cutting performance, bulk properties

4. Surface Properties

• Smoothness (Bendtsen or Sheffield roughness)
• pH (for coating compatibility)
• Sizing (water resistance of base paper)

In-Process Monitoring

Print Quality:

• Color density (densitometer readings every 100m)
• Registration marks (automated camera systems)
• Defect detection (inline cameras scanning 100% of web)

Coating Weight:

• Inline basis weight measurement
• Offline sampling and testing
• Target: ±5% from specification

Die-Cutting:

• Sample inspection every 500 pieces
• Check dimensional accuracy
• Verify edge quality (no fraying or raggedness)

Final Product Testing

Food Contact Packaging:

Migration Testing:

• Every new product design
• Annual verification for existing products
• Cost: £2,000-4,000 per test

Performance Testing:

• Kit test: Grease resistance
• Cobb test: Moisture resistance
• Adhesion test: Coating integrity
• Tensile strength: Mechanical properties

Section 6: Material Selection Guide

Base Paper Grades

Bleached Kraft:

• Properties: High strength, bright white, good printability
• Weights: 30-150 gsm typical
• Applications: Food wrapping, premium packaging, printing substrates
• Cost: £950-1,400/tonne

Unbleached Kraft:

• Properties: Natural brown color, maximum strength, renewable image
• Weights: 40-200 gsm typical
• Applications: Heavy-duty wrapping, industrial packaging, eco-focused brands
• Cost: £850-1,200/tonne

Greaseproof Papers:

• Properties: Inherent grease resistance (mechanical processing of pulp)
• Weights: 30-60 gsm typical
• Applications: Bakery, food service where coating not desired
• Cost: £1,200-1,800/tonne

MG/MF Tissue:

• Properties: Very lightweight, soft texture
• MG (Machine Glazed): One smooth side
• MF (Machine Finished): Both sides similar
• Weights: 17-25 gsm typical
• Applications: Gift wrap, tissue paper, interleaving
• Cost: £900-1,500/tonne

Selection Decision Tree

Question 1: What mechanical strength is required?

• High strength → Kraft papers
• Moderate strength → MG tissue or lightweight kraft
• Low strength acceptable → MF tissue

Question 2: What appearance is needed?

• Bright white → Bleached kraft or bleached MG
• Natural/eco appearance → Unbleached kraft
• Color flexibility → Any (but bleached takes color better)

Question 3: What barrier properties?

• High grease resistance → Greaseproof or coated
• High moisture resistance → Coated
• Moderate barriers → Base paper + appropriate coating

Question 4: What is price sensitivity?

• Budget-conscious → Unbleached kraft, MF tissue
• Mid-range → Bleached kraft
• Premium acceptable → Specialty grades

Section 7: Process Optimization and Troubleshooting

Common Problems and Solutions

Problem 1: Print Mottle (Uneven Ink Density)

Causes:

• Substrate moisture variation
• Inadequate impression pressure
• Ink viscosity too high or low
• Anilox worn or damaged

Diagnosis:

• Check substrate moisture (should be 6-8%)
• Verify impression pressure (ink transfer must be uniform)
• Measure ink viscosity (Zahn cup)
• Inspect anilox under magnification

Solutions:

• Condition substrate (allow equilibration)
• Adjust impression pressure
• Correct ink viscosity
• Replace or re-engrave anilox

Problem 2: Coating Streaks

Causes:

• Contamination on coating blade
• Substrate defects (holes, lumps)
• Coating viscosity too high
• Coating solids too high/inconsistent

Solutions:

• Clean blade and coating pan thoroughly
• Inspect incoming substrate more carefully
• Adjust viscosity
• Improve mixing and solids monitoring

Problem 3: Die-Cutting Quality Issues

Edge Fraying:

• Dull dies → sharpen or replace
• Excessive cutting depth → adjust
• Wrong paper grain direction → specify correct orientation

Incomplete Cutting:

• Insufficient pressure → increase
• Die wear → sharpen or replace
• Substrate thickness variation → improve incoming QC

Process Capability Analysis

Statistical Process Control (SPC):

Key Metrics:

• Cp (Process Capability): Ratio of specification width to process width
• Cpk (Process Capability Index): Accounts for process centering
• Target: Cp and Cpk > 1.33 (indicates capable process)

Example: Coating weight specification: 25 ±2 g/m² Actual process standard deviation: 0.8 g/m²

Cp = (Specification width) / (6 × σ) = 4 / (6 × 0.8) = 0.83

Interpretation: Process is NOT capable (Cp < 1.33). Need to improve process control or widen specification.

Section 8: Innovation and Future Technologies

Digital Printing Integration

Advantages:

• No printing plates (reduces setup cost and time)
• Variable data possible (personalization, serialization)
• Very short runs economical
• Design iteration rapid

Current Limitations:

• Slower speed vs. flexo (30-60 m/min typical)
• Higher ink cost per impression
• Food contact approval still developing
• Color gamut differences vs. flexo

Our Approach:

• Hybrid system: Digital for short runs, flexo for production
• Currently evaluating digital systems for 2025 installation

Inline Quality Monitoring

Machine Vision Systems:

• 100% web inspection
• Automatic defect detection and classification
• Real-time alerts to operators
• Data logging for process improvement

Benefits:

• Catch defects before reaching customer
• Reduce waste
• Process improvement insights

Investment: £50,000-150,000 depending on sophistication

Sustainable Process Innovation

Energy Recovery:

• Heat recovery from drying systems
• Expected energy reduction: 15-20%
• Payback: 3-5 years

Water-Based Everything:

• Continuing development of water-based coatings with performance parity to solvent systems
• Eliminated solvent-based inks (achieved 2018)
• Target: Eliminate all solvent-based coatings by 2028

Conclusion: Mastery Through Understanding

Converting paper into functional packaging requires mastering multiple processes, each with dozens of variables affecting final quality. Success comes from:

1. Deep technical knowledge of process fundamentals
2. Systematic quality control at every stage
3. Continuous optimization based on data
4. Material science understanding for proper selection
5. Investment in technology to remain competitive

After 50+ years, we've learned that there are no shortcuts. Great packaging comes from great processes, executed consistently, with disciplined quality systems.

For Customers: Understanding these processes helps you specify requirements correctly, appreciate the complexity involved, and recognize when a converter has genuine technical capability vs. just equipment.

[CTA: "Have specific technical questions about converting processes for your application? Our technical team provides free consultation on process selection and optimization. Contact us to discuss your requirements."]

Related Sub-Articles

• Flexographic Printing on Paper: Process Variables for Food Safety and Quality
• Coating Technologies: Wax, Silicone, and Heat-Seal Applications
• Die-Cutting and Converting: Precision Manufacturing for Custom Products
• Quality Control in Food-Grade Converting: Testing, Standards, Compliance
• Material Selection Guide: Paper Grades, Weights, and Properties

Technical Resources:

• TAPPI Standards (Paper Testing): [URL]
• FTA (Flexographic Technical Association): [URL]
• CEPI (European Paper Industry): [URL]